Our prayer @ CRUSH THE SERPENT is that the reader of this blog will become a "lover of truth", and "search the Scriptures to see if these things are so". Our experience has shown us that a great blanket of deception has been cast over the earth, and particularly over the Evangelical Christian Church. We challenge every Christian to re-examine what they have been taught about end-time Bible prophecy. "I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your pure minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ".

Tuesday, November 13, 2018


December 23, 2013 came and went with very little mentioned about what may be the most infamous centennial in American history. December 23, 1913 was the day that the American people were turned into little more than lowly serfs in the Zionist kingdom of the New World Order. For it was on December 23, 1913 that President Woodrow Wilson signed into law "The Federal Reserve Act" which effectively gave our US Treasury over to International Bankers, most of whom are not based in America. Control of our money, our economic future, was put into the hands of the Zionist New World Order bankers - Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Warsburgs, J.P. Morgan, etc.

One of President Wilson's appointed heads of the Federal Reserve was Paul Warburg. Warburg was German-born(1868) into the famed Warburg Banking family of Germany. Warburg didn't even come to America until 1902. Yet, this German-born Jewish banker was appointed to the board of The Federal Reserve Bank. One of the first actions of the newly formed Federal Reserve was to finance the Allied forces inWW I. A war that we had no business in. A war that we fought to further the interests of the world bankers, ie., the Zionists who were plotting and scheming to gain control of Palestine. Representative Charles Lindbergh Sr. wrote two books , one opposing the Federal Reserve Act, and the other opposing U.S. involvement in WW I: "Banking, Currency, and The Money Trust"(1913) and "Why Is Your Country At War?"(1917).

Interestingly, the legislation that President Wilson finally signed into law was crafted over ten days (in a secluded meeting on Jekyll Island, Georgia) by Senate Leader Nelson Aldrich and banking executives, Charles Norton(First National Bank NY), Henry Davison(J.P. Morgan), Frank Vanderlip(Rockefellers), Paul Warburg(Kuhn, Loeb & Co.), and Col. Edward House who later founded the Council On Foreign Relations(CFR). 

The Original Board Members of The Federal Reserve Bank
Frederic A Delano (American Railroad President - Uncle of FDR, Franklin Delano Roosevelt)
Paul M Warburg
William P G Harding
Adolph C Miller
Charles S Hamlin - Governor
John Skelton Williams - Comptroller of the Currency
William G McAdoo - Chairman

The 10 Banks That Control All 12 Branches Of The Federal Reserve Bank
N M Rothschild - London
Rothschild Bank - Berlin
Warburg Bank - Hamburg
Warburg Bank - Amsterdam
Lehman Bros. - New York
Lazard Bros. - Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank - New York
Israel Moses Seif - Italy
Goldman Sachs - New York
J. P. Morgan - New York

The 4 Individuals Who Own Large Shares Of The Federal Reserve
William Rockefeller
Paul Warburg
Jacob Schiff (Inside Kuhn Loeb)
James Stillman (Inside Citigroup - Married into Rockefellers since about 1900)



Monday, November 12, 2018

New World Order - Secret Societies - Bible Prophecy

Take the time to watch this 2 Hour plus documentary about the fantastical, and evil plotters of the Secret Societies who are tools of Satan to establish a New World Order that will culminate in the coronation of the antichrist in Jerusalem, which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt (Revelation 11:8).

The web address for this video is: www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL6v8nzFiUk 

Thursday, November 8, 2018


 A Poll Finds More Americans Disagree With The Statement That 'Jews Control Hollywood.' But Here's One Jew Who Doesn't. By Joel Stein LA Times Dec. 19, 2008

I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you'd be flipping between "The 700 Club" and "Davey and Goliath" on TV all day.

So I've taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that's what we do best. I'm weighing several slogans, including: "Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!"; "Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible"; and "Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all."

I called ADL Chairman Abe Foxman, who was in Santiago, Chile, where, he told me to my dismay, he was not hunting Nazis. He dismissed my whole proposition, saying that the number of people who think Jews run Hollywood is still too high. The ADL poll, he pointed out, showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood execs "do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans," and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to "weaken the influence of religious values in this country."

That's a sinister canard, Foxman said. "It means they think Jews meet at Canter's Deli on Friday mornings to decide what's best for the Jews." Foxman's argument made me rethink: I have to eat at Canter's more often.

"That's a very dangerous phrase, 'Jews control Hollywood.' What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood," he said. Instead of "control," Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry "happen to be Jewish," as in "all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish."

But Foxman said he is proud of the accomplishments of American Jews. "I think Jews are disproportionately represented in the creative industry. They're disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well," he said. He argues that this does not mean that Jews make pro-Jewish movies any more than they do pro-Jewish surgery. Though other countries, I've noticed, aren't so big on circumcision.

I appreciate Foxman's concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

Wednesday, November 7, 2018


Take the time to read FORBE'S Magazine's interview with Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and gain insight into "The Trump Machine" that is overloaded with Jewish protagonists and Gentile Zionists. CLICK HERE TO READ: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2016/11/22/exclusive-interview-how-jared-kushner-won-trump-the-white-house/#38e55d85249b

#1 Sure, it may be just a happenstance, but interestingly Jared Kushner's skyscraper headquarters is located at 666 Fifth Ave in New York City!!! 

#2 Silicon Valley Billionaire Peter Thiel is the only significant Silicon Valley figure to publicly back Trump.
(Thiel is listed as a member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group, a private, annual gathering of intellectual figures, political leaders and business executives. He has participated in every conference between 2007 and 2016.) >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel

#3 Henry Kissinger (Zionist Jew) is advising Donald Trump on foreign policy issues. “Every president I’ve ever known has one or two people he intuitively and structurally trusts,” says former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, who has known Trump socially for decades and is currently advising the president-elect on foreign policy issues. “I think Jared might be that person.”

#4 Corey Lewandowski 
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/03/donald-trump-s-campaign-chief-backed-a-crooked-congressman-called-him-my-surrogate-father.html Notice the people that Lewandowski has been associated with. Lewandowski has since been fired. He was replaced by Kellyanne Conway.

#5 Hope Hicks
As an employee of PR firm Hiltzik Strategies, Hicks began working with Ivanka Trump on her fashion line in 2012, and then on other Trump ventures.In August 2014 she joined the Trump Organization full-time. Donald Trump earmarked her for the role of press secretary in January 2015 when planning for a potential presidential run. After Trump's first primary victories, Hicks was asked to make a choice between staying with the Trump Organization or fully pledging herself to the campaign. Her initial decision was to leave the campaign, but Trump convinced her to remain and she has stayed on as press secretary.
Hicks grew up in Greenwich, Connecticut, did teen modeling and attended Greenwich High School. At age 11, she and older sister were hired to model for Ralph Lauren. She graduated from Southern Methodist University in 2010, where she also played lacrosse. She worked for public relations firm Hiltzik Strategies. Her father Paul B. Hicks III was an executive vice-president of communications for the NFL. Her late grandfather, Paul Hicks, was President and General Manager of Public Relations for Texaco.
Hiltzik Strategies founded by Matthew Hiltzik, (Click Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Hiltzik and here http://gawker.com/550993/matthew-hiltzik for mind-numbing connections)

#6 Steve Bannon (President Trump's Chief Strategist)
Kushner says. “All I know about Steve is my experience working with him. He’s an incredible Zionist and loves Israel. He was one of the leaders in the anti-divestiture campaign. And what I’ve seen from working together with him was somebody who did not fit the description that people are pushing on him." Wiki on Bannon >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon >>> Take note of the fact that Steve Bannon is often portrayed as an anti-semite for the sheeple to bleat over when in fact Bannon is a Zionist and Pro Israel. We the people are being played by the masters of deception. 

#7 Rupert Murdoch, "Crypto-Jew* owner of Fox News says of Jared Kushner, “I assume he’ll be in the White House throughout the entire presidency,” says News Corp. billionaire Rupert Murdoch. “For the next four or eight years he’ll be a strong voice, maybe even the strongest after the vice president.” 

* "Rupert's father Sir Keith Murdoch [see below] attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife's connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town. For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew... http://jewwatch.com/jew-entertainment-news-monopoly-murdoch-jew-part1.html

Tuesday, November 6, 2018


You Gotta Watch This!!! We've Been Duped Again. When You Think Of Mobsters, Which Nationality Comes To Mind???

Part 1 

Part 2

Part 3

Sunday, November 4, 2018


Have you ever wondered why we are constantly bombarded with Holocaust history in the media, in the film industry, in magazines, and ever-present news articles? Something is up, and this video gives you some insight into what has been going on for 100 years. Yes the number 6 million has been published in newspapers since WW1, and the Holocaust of 6 million didn't happen until WW2. Open your mind to the possibilities that we have been deceived by the masters of deception.

Friday, October 13, 2017


The former Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry hails from Massachusetts, a state that contains America's largest Irish Catholic population. As a practicing Catholic himself, even the best friends of Kerry have considered him an American Irish Catholic through and through. The discovery of John Kerry’s European Jewish roots has surprised many people, including the secretary of state himself.   

Is JOHN KERRY Catholic or Jewish? >>> 

John Forbes Kerry??? Why is Senator John Kerry's middle name "Forbes"? The answer is because his mother is Rosemary Forbes,  the beneficiary of the FORBES FAMILY TRUSTS.

Newfound Jewish Roots Gave John Kerry a "Deep " Bond With Israel >>> 

When Kerry Was Kohn: The Jewish Roots of John Kerry >>> 


Is it possible that Hugh Hefner was a CIA asset that was an MK ULTRA operative who was a tool of the Zionists to destroy the moral fabric of American society via the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion/PLAYBOY? 

Tuesday, September 19, 2017


Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC)
The Apollo Affair was a 1965 incident in which a US company, Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC), in the Pittsburgh suburbs of Apollo and Parks Township, Pennsylvania was investigated for losing 200–600 pounds (91–272 kg) of highly enriched uranium, with suspicions that it had gone to Israel's nuclear weapons program


Monday, August 7, 2017


The crimes within crimes within crimes. Master deceivers work their magic on 9-11.

Monday, February 6, 2017


Jesus said, "...because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall grow cold." St Paul said to Timothy, "The Spirit clearly says that in the latter times some will adandon the Faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons." The inspired St Paul went on to say, "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days, People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God...Have nothing to do with them."

Look At What Todays Children Are Being Fed:

Wednesday, January 25, 2017


This article, from the "Economist", is from a comment posted on www.RealJewNews.com

  • Mr. Pedro Aja January 25, 2017 @ 2:23 pm The war that Trump is waging and the ‘group’ he is fighting were anticipated in an article written for The Economist 30 years ago. As you know that magazine is owned by the Rothschilds among others. Enjoy the flashback.
    Title of article: Get Ready for the Phoenix
    Source: Economist; 01/9/88, Vol. 306, pp 9-10
    THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency.
    Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favored by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
    At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates - a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform.
    For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October.
    These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretense of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.
    But in spite of all the trouble governments have in reaching and (harder still) sticking to international agreements about macroeconomic policy, the conviction is growing that exchange rates cannot be left to themselves.
    Remember that the Louvre accord and its predecessor, the Plaza agreement of September 1985, were emergency measures to deal with a crisis of currency instability.
    Between 1983 and 1985 the dollar rose by 34% against the currencies of America’s trading partners; since then it has fallen by 42%. Such changes have skewed the pattern of international comparative advantage more drastically in four years than underlying economic forces might do in a whole generation.
    In the past few days the world’s main central banks, fearing another dollar collapse, have again jointly intervened in the currency markets (see page 62).
    Market-loving ministers such as Britain’s Mr. Nigel Lawson have been converted to the cause of exchange-rate stability. Japanese officials take seriously he idea of EMS-like schemes for the main industrial economies. Regardless of the Louvre’s embarrassing failure, the conviction remains that something must be done about exchange rates.
    Something will be, almost certainly in the course of 1988. And not long after the next currency agreement is signed it will go the same way as the last one. It will collapse. Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability.
    Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stock market crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice.
    This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by a patch-up followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond 2018 - except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very tends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.
    The new world economy
    The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates.
    As a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another.
    These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.
    Alongside that trend is another - of ever-expanding opportunities for international trade. This too is the gift of advancing technology. Falling transport costs will make it easier for countries thousands of miles apart to compete in each others’ markets.
    The law of one price (that a good should cost the same everywhere, once prices are converted into a single currency) will increasingly assert itself. Politicians permitting, national economies will follow their financial markets - becoming ever more open to the outside world.
    This will apply to labour as much as to goods, partly thorough migration but also through technology’s ability to separate the worker form the point at which he delivers his labour. Indian computer operators will be processing New Yorkers’ paychecks.
    In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments.
    In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.
    The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate - and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge.
    Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today.
    This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.
    As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades.
    Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies.
    That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.
    The alternative - to preserve policy making autonomy - would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows.
    This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.
    Copyright of The Economist is the property of Economist Newspaper Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a list-serve without the copyright holder’s express written permission.
    However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.